Re: [reSIProcate] Move to autotools ;)
On 22/05/12 14:49, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> I'm glad to see a move to autotools. I've worked on most of the
> autotools support for sipXecs. Anyway, just thought I'd offer my
> services (thru this list or otherwise) in case you need it.
We would definitely benefit from anyone else trying it out
If you like, you can build a release tarball (it is very easy, just run
build/release-tarball.sh) and then unpack the tarball somewhere and try
to use it
Or you can just pull one of my test tarballs from the debian mentors
site, unpack it and try to build:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/resiprocate/
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
So far we've verified that the autotools build is almost completely
automatic on Debian, Ubuntu, Solaris (using SunPro), and MacOS - if you
can verify other platforms, that is also good.
> On a related note, I just committed build integration for resiprocate
> to the sipXecs. I took svn rev 9367 before any autotools work. I
> forked the spec file, but I imagine this will be in flux as the work
> to autotools continues so I'll hang on to my patches there.
>
> https://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/commit/3df7aac3397f525ab5ec8028d18a95777c7915f8
Is this something you were going to push back into the resiprocate repo,
or you just maintain your own fork of the spec file externally?
I can definitely tell you that things like the configure command line
will need to be changed (just run ./configure --help to see the new options)
Filenames and some locations also change, e.g. the libs now have names
like librutil-1.8.so rather than just librutil.so