Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
Ok, I hope this will answer the question
Output of Ares config options:
--build=x86 --host=mips-linux
CC=/home/ahuja/aksys/tools/linux/bin/mips_fp_le-gcc
AR=/home/ahuja/aksys/tools/linux/bin/mips_fp_le-ar rcs
CFLAGS=-D__DEBUG__ -Dassert=ASSERT -I/home/ahuja/aksys/phoneApp/shared
-g -ggdb -O0 RANLIB=/home/ahuja/aksys/tools/linux/bin/mips_fp_le-ranlib
Resip Config options are:
-C --build=x86 --host=mips-linux
CXX=/home/ahuja/aksys/tools/linux/bin/mips_fp_le-g++
CXXFLAGS=-D__DEBUG__ -Dassert=ASSERT -I/home/ahuja/aksys/phoneApp/shared
-g -ggdb -O0
--with-ares=/home/ahuja/aksys/phoneApp/libraries/dum/main/sip/contrib/
LDFLAGS=-L/home/ahuja/aksys/phoneApp/libraries/dum/main/sip/contrib/ares/mips
The above is from resiprocate's first version 0.99 I think. I am trying
to get the latest one running with the mips tools.
Thanks for bearing with me Adam.
Waiting....
Adam Roach wrote:
On 4/28/08 2:00 PM, Mandeep Ahuja wrote:
Ok Let me get this right. Lets try where I dont have to use the
autotools
I think you misunderstand what I'm asking. Ares uses autotools, so we
don't have any option here -- we need to be able to run ./configure
for ares so that ares can be built. I've not worked with build
environments in which the name of the compiler differed from the name
of the platform. It's just not a problem I've ever encountered, so I
don't know how to solve it. Apparently, you *do* know how to solve it,
because it's the environment you're working in.
So.
I think I can fix the problem you're encountering if you can clearly,
concisely, and accurately answer just one question: With your
environment, what would you literally type in to the commandline to
configure ares to build? (In your answer, include the output of the
configure command so I know what I should expect to see).
/a
(might see a problem again future)
--host=mips-linux
corss_compile = ~/tools/linux/bin/mips_fp_le-
the cross compiler is "mips_fp_le"
Also when i was trying to make 'rutil' it complained about not
finding 'ostream' which is in
~/tools/linux/target/user/include/g++-3/ directory.
I hope that can be of some help
Mandeep
Adam Roach wrote:
I'll see if I can fix this fairly quickly -- what are the exact
options that you would expect to pass to an autotools-generated
./configure script to set the compiler correctly? Is it simply
"./configure --host=mips_fp_le"? I'll admit that my knowledge of
autotools is a bit meager; but, as far as I know, the only way to
trigger cross compilation with autotools is to pass it the name of
the architecture with the "--host" flag -- and it does the same
thing with it as the resip build system does: it prepends it to the
names of the various gnu toolchain binaries, and tries it to see
whether it works.
In other words: I can split the target platform option into two
different options (target platform and cross-compiler prefix) if
that's what you need to suit your purposes, but I don't know enough
about the autotools systems that I need to pass options into (such
as ares) to know what to pass where and how.
/a
On 4/28/08 12:08 PM, Mandeep Ahuja wrote:
Thanks for the heads up Adam,
Here is the first problem
1- The architecture-ostype (in my case mips-linux) does not match
with platform string in the name of my cross compiler
(mips_fp_le-gcc). I dont plan to change either of the names as I
have lot going on already. What can I do to get around?
Here is a little sample output
mkdir -p contrib/ares-build.Linux.mips
cd contrib/ares-build.Linux.mips && \
../ares/configure --host=mips-linux
configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't
use --host.
If a cross compiler is detected then cross compile mode will be
used.
Configuring ares 1.1.2
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for mips-linux-strip... no
checking for strip... strip
checking for mips-linux-gcc... no
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of executables...
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
checking for mips-linux-ranlib... no
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... mips-unknown-linux-gnu
Adam Roach wrote:
Mandeep Ahuja wrote:
I need the autotools scripts that you guys had earlier. Remember
the 'use_autotools.sh' and 'auto_gen.sh'. I can't find them in
the latest checkout. I think last time i checked out was in 2004.
If noone has it will the old one work with the new revision. I am
doing cross-compiling.
The autotools setup never really got completed (at least, not to
everyone's satisfaction), and has been pulled out of the
repository for a long time now. Even if you can find a copy, I do
_not_ suggest you use it. It is highly doubtful that it will work
with the current tree (which has been vigorously reorganized since
the last time anyone tried autotools) -- at least, not without a
lot of effort.
You're not stuck, though. The current build system has pretty good
support for cross compilation using the gnu toolchain. Run the
configure script (in the root of the project tree); when it asks
which toolchain you plan on using, answer "gnu-cross." It will
then prompt you for the path to the cross compiler and the name of
the platform formatted as architecture-ostype (e.g., "arm-linux").
This platform name must match the platform string in the name of
your cross compiler. (i.e., if your cross compiler is called
"arm-linux-gcc", then your platform is called "arm-linux").
If you have any problems with the cross-compilation support in the
existing build system, post here about it so we can try to make
things work better.
/a
- References:
- Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
- Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
- Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
- Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
- Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
- Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18