< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
The bug link in the mail pointed to below is stale. The current version is http://bugs.sipit.net/show_bug.cgi?id=706 You'll note the bug is for a clarification - not a change in normative behavior. But again, the point is that 1) When you are an endpoint, it is your decision when to abandon an INVITE client transaction - the spec _explicitly and on purpose_ does not mandate an exit from the proceeding state. In code, this means the user of the stack has the responsibility to terminate an INVITE transaction in that state. The stack CANNOT do that by itself. 2) When you are a proxy, you have timer C around to help you make that decision. You can look at the way repro uses timer C as an example of how a TU tells the stack that its no longer willing to leave the INVITE transaction in that state. I do not see a bug in the resiprocate code here. RjS On May 3, 2007, at 11:20 AM, kaiduan xie wrote:
|