< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] Leaking transactions


Please see a very old debate on sip implementor list,
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/sip-implementors/2003-December/005785.html 
kaiduan

----- Original Message ----
From: Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: kaiduan xie <kaiduanx@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Greg Inglis <Greg.Inglis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2007 9:48:46 AM
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Leaking transactions

Well, that isn't exactly the case. For endpoints, we tear down the transaction when the _user_ decides to stop pursuing it. For proxies, we use Timer C. There is no defined mechanism for B2BUAs, but I would expect that something like Timer C could be used.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

Yes, this is a bug in resiprocate, and a bug in rfc 3261. Same thing happens for UAS INVITE transaction.

kaiduan

----- Original Message ----
From: Greg Inglis <Greg.Inglis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2007 6:13:47 AM
Subject: [reSIProcate] Leaking transactions

Hi there,
 
I am getting a memory leak in my application when I end my UAC session while the session is in a 'UAC_Early' state
i.e. I've got a '180 Ringing' from the remote UAS endpoint but I haven't received a '200 OK' as yet.
 
I'm getting the following statistics message from the stack afterwards:
 
TU summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX 1 SERVERTX 0 TIMERS 0
Transaction summary: reqi 0 reqo 6 rspi 8 rspo 0
Details: INVi 0/S0/F0 INVo 2/S0/F1 ACKi 0 ACKo 1 BYEi 0/S0/F0 BYEo 1/S1/F0 CANi 0/S0/F0 CANo 0/S0/F0 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi 0/S0/F0 REGo 2/S1/F1 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi 0/S0/F0 NOTo 0/S0/F0
Retransmissions: INVx 0 BYEx 0 CANx 0 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0 finx 0 nonx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0
The 'CLIENTTX 1' in the TU summary doesn't go away no matter how long I wait - I assume this means a transaction has leaked somehow?
I am ending the session by calling ClientInviteSession::end() and subsequently calling process() on the stack and DUM - is there some step I am missing here?
 
I'm using reSiprocate 1.1 built on VC8 SP1 and my SIP proxy is asterisk.
 
Any help would be appreciated
 
Greg Inglis
Software Engineer

Telephonetics VIP Ltd
"
making
sound 
          business
sense"


Simply dial +44 (0) 1442 242 242 and ask for me by name.

For Technical Support / Fault Logging please use support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Emails to my personal address will not be managed in my absence.

www.telephoneticsVIP.co.uk

Providing innovative hosted and customer premises speech recognition and voice automation solutions.

Winner of the National Business Awards (SE Region) Business Innovation of the Year 2004 & 2005 and Dacorum Business Of The Year Award 2003 & 2006.

Disclaimer:
The disclaimer available at
http://www.telephoneticsVIP.co.uk/telephonetics/emaildisclaimer.jsp or by sending email to <mailto:email-disclaimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> applies to this email.

 
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel



Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo! Mail
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list




Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers.