reSIProcate

Mailing Lists

Source Code

Google Search:



< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] resiprocate stack memeory leak?????

I waited for more than 10 minutes to get the result of my previous email.

There are no calls for more than an hour, and I use gdb to print:
(gdb) p mTransactionController.mClientTransactionMap.size()
warning: can't find class named `resip::SipStack', as given by C++ RTTI
$1 = 1998
(gdb) p mTransactionController.mServerTransactionMap.size()
warning: can't find class named `resip::SipStack', as given by C++ RTTI
$2 = 10691


Thanks

Frank Yuan




Jason Fischl wrote:

Transactions last for 32 seconds after they terminate. This means you
have to wait at least 32 seconds after your last call to see if there
is a leak.

On 9/21/06, FrankYuan <frankyuan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


 After call generator stopped for 10 minutes, I found that the resip
statistics did not have any problem on these FIFO queues.
 So I created core file and print the size of Transaction map.
There are still lot of TIDs in the transaction map. At least it is part of 
culprit to hold memory.
 Should there be a grarbage collection to free  these lost TIDs?

 Here are the log files:

 20060921-125408.091 | TuSelector.cxx:71 | Stats message
 20060921-125408.091 | StatisticsMessage.cxx:153 | RESIP:TRANSACTION
TU summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX 1998 SERVERTX 10690 TIMERS 
0
 Transaction summary: reqi 1225266 reqo 1200525 rspi 955555 rspo 1229993
Details: INVi 383069/S322324/F36145 INVo 344348/S322414/F0 ACKi 312462 ACKo 
3223
60 BYEi 507150/S507141/F0 BYEo 307875/S307111/F0 CANi 22517/S507141/F0 CANo 
2223
 /S1550/F593 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi
68/S64/F0 R
 EGo 0/S0/F0 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi
0/S0/F0 NOT
 o 0/S0/F0
 Retransmissions: INVx 116463 BYEx 105757 CANx 1499 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0
finx 0 n
 onx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0
 20060921-125708.084 | TuSelector.cxx:71 | Stats message
 20060921-125708.084 | StatisticsMessage.cxx:153 | RESIP:TRANSACTION
TU summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX 1998 SERVERTX 10690 TIMERS 
0
 Transaction summary: reqi 1225268 reqo 1200525 rspi 955555 rspo 1229995
Details: INVi 383069/S322324/F36145 INVo 344348/S322414/F0 ACKi 312462 ACKo 
3223
60 BYEi 507150/S507141/F0 BYEo 307875/S307111/F0 CANi 22517/S507141/F0 CANo 
2223
 /S1550/F593 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi
70/S66/F0 R
 EGo 0/S0/F0 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi
0/S0/F0 NOT
 o 0/S0/F0
 Retransmissions: INVx 116463 BYEx 105757 CANx 1499 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0
finx 0 n
 onx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0
 20060921-130008.078 | TuSelector.cxx:71 | Stats message
 20060921-130008.085 | StatisticsMessage.cxx:153 | RESIP:TRANSACTION
TU summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX 1998 SERVERTX 10690 TIMERS 
0
 Transaction summary: reqi 1225270 reqo 1200525 rspi 955555 rspo 1229997
Details: INVi 383069/S322324/F36145 INVo 344348/S322414/F0 ACKi 312462 ACKo 
3223
60 BYEi 507150/S507141/F0 BYEo 307875/S307111/F0 CANi 22517/S507141/F0 CANo 
2223
 /S1550/F593 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi
72/S68/F0 R
 EGo 0/S0/F0 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi
0/S0/F0 NOT
 o 0/S0/F0
 Retransmissions: INVx 116463 BYEx 105757 CANx 1499 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0
finx 0 n
 onx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0


 (gdb) p
(EnSipStack->myStack->mTransactionController->mClientTransactionMap)
 warning: can't find class named `resip::SipStack', as given by C++ RTTI
 $1 = {mMap = {_M_ht = {_M_node_allocator = {<No data fields>},
       _M_hash = {<No data fields>},
       _M_equals =
{<binary_function<resip::Data,resip::Data,bool>> = {<No
data f
 ields>}, <No data fields>},
       _M_get_key = {<unary_function<std::pair<const
resip::Data, resip::Transact
 ionState*>,const resip::Data>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>},
       _M_buckets =
{<_Vector_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const
res
 ip::Data, resip::TransactionState*>
>*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*>
 >> =
{<_Vector_alloc_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const
resip::Data
 , resip::TransactionState*>
>*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*>,true>> =
  {_M_start = 0x920bdd10, _M_finish = 0x920c9d14,
_M_end_of_storage = 0x920c9d14}, <No data fields>}, <No data 
fields>
 }, _M_num_elements = 1998}}}
 (gdb) p
(EnSipStack->myStack->mTransactionController->mServerTransactionMap)
 warning: can't find class named `resip::SipStack', as given by C++ RTTI
 $2 = {mMap = {_M_ht = {_M_node_allocator = {<No data fields>},
       _M_hash = {<No data fields>},
       _M_equals =
{<binary_function<resip::Data,resip::Data,bool>> = {<No
data f
 ields>}, <No data fields>},
       _M_get_key = {<unary_function<std::pair<const
resip::Data, resip::Transact
 ionState*>,const resip::Data>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>},
       _M_buckets =
{<_Vector_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const
res
 ip::Data, resip::TransactionState*>
>*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*>
 >> =
{<_Vector_alloc_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const
resip::Data
 , resip::TransactionState*>
>*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*>,true>> =
  {_M_start = 0x8cc3e790, _M_finish = 0x8cc567d4,
_M_end_of_storage = 0x8cc567d4}, <No data fields>}, <No data 
fields>
 }, _M_num_elements = 10691}}}
























































 Thanks

Frank Yuan
Emergent-Netsolutions.com
972-359-6600


 FrankYuan wrote:
 I am still working on it and will let you know as soon as I find
anything related.

Thanks

Frank Yuan
Emergent-Netsolutions.com
972-359-6600



Byron Campen wrote:


 This code was written long before my time here at resiprocate, so
I do not know. To those who are in the know, is this a relic that can
be safely done away with?

Did you verify whether or not you had a genuine memory leak (this is
something I am very interested to know)?

Best regards,
Byron Campen




 My question why NoSize(0U-1) is used for mSize when clear func is
called.

mStateMachineFifo.size() may return either 0 or NoSize if the queue
is empty.

It should alway return 0 if the queue is empty and NoSize should not
be used.

NoSize causes confusion and is error prone.

Thanks

Frank Yuan
Emergent-Netsolutions.com
972-359-6600



Jason Fischl wrote:


 On 9/20/06, Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


 As for your questions about AbstractFifo, I am unsure why
mSize is
needed. Can anyone answer this (or, answer why clear is a no-op)?


 The clear method is virtual and gets defined in the subclasses.

I believe that mSize is there as an optimization.


 _______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel