< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
After call generator stopped for 10 minutes, I found that the resip
statistics did not have any problem on these FIFO queues. So I created core file and print the size of Transaction map. There are still lot of TIDs in the transaction map. At least it is part of culprit to hold memory. Should there be a grarbage collection to free these lost TIDs? Here are the log files: 20060921-125408.091 | TuSelector.cxx:71 | Stats message 20060921-125408.091 | StatisticsMessage.cxx:153 | RESIP:TRANSACTION TU summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX 1998 SERVERTX 10690 TIMERS 0 Transaction summary: reqi 1225266 reqo 1200525 rspi 955555 rspo 1229993 Details: INVi 383069/S322324/F36145 INVo 344348/S322414/F0 ACKi 312462 ACKo 3223 60 BYEi 507150/S507141/F0 BYEo 307875/S307111/F0 CANi 22517/S507141/F0 CANo 2223 /S1550/F593 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi 68/S64/F0 R EGo 0/S0/F0 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi 0/S0/F0 NOT o 0/S0/F0 Retransmissions: INVx 116463 BYEx 105757 CANx 1499 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0 finx 0 n onx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0 20060921-125708.084 | TuSelector.cxx:71 | Stats message 20060921-125708.084 | StatisticsMessage.cxx:153 | RESIP:TRANSACTION TU summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX 1998 SERVERTX 10690 TIMERS 0 Transaction summary: reqi 1225268 reqo 1200525 rspi 955555 rspo 1229995 Details: INVi 383069/S322324/F36145 INVo 344348/S322414/F0 ACKi 312462 ACKo 3223 60 BYEi 507150/S507141/F0 BYEo 307875/S307111/F0 CANi 22517/S507141/F0 CANo 2223 /S1550/F593 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi 70/S66/F0 R EGo 0/S0/F0 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi 0/S0/F0 NOT o 0/S0/F0 Retransmissions: INVx 116463 BYEx 105757 CANx 1499 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0 finx 0 n onx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0 20060921-130008.078 | TuSelector.cxx:71 | Stats message 20060921-130008.085 | StatisticsMessage.cxx:153 | RESIP:TRANSACTION TU summary: 0 TRANSPORT 0 TRANSACTION 0 CLIENTTX 1998 SERVERTX 10690 TIMERS 0 Transaction summary: reqi 1225270 reqo 1200525 rspi 955555 rspo 1229997 Details: INVi 383069/S322324/F36145 INVo 344348/S322414/F0 ACKi 312462 ACKo 3223 60 BYEi 507150/S507141/F0 BYEo 307875/S307111/F0 CANi 22517/S507141/F0 CANo 2223 /S1550/F593 MSGi 0/S0/F0 MSGo 0/S0/F0 OPTi 0/S0/F0 OPTo 0/S0/F0 REGi 72/S68/F0 R EGo 0/S0/F0 PUBi 0/S0/F0 PUBo 0/S0/F0 SUBi 0/S0/F0 SUBo 0/S0/F0 NOTi 0/S0/F0 NOT o 0/S0/F0 Retransmissions: INVx 116463 BYEx 105757 CANx 1499 MSGx 0 OPTx 0 REGx 0 finx 0 n onx 0 PUBx 0 SUBx 0 NOTx 0 (gdb) p (EnSipStack->myStack->mTransactionController->mClientTransactionMap) warning: can't find class named `resip::SipStack', as given by C++ RTTI $1 = {mMap = {_M_ht = {_M_node_allocator = {<No data fields>}, _M_hash = {<No data fields>}, _M_equals = {<binary_function<resip::Data,resip::Data,bool>> = {<No data f ields>}, <No data fields>}, _M_get_key = {<unary_function<std::pair<const resip::Data, resip::Transact ionState*>,const resip::Data>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, _M_buckets = {<_Vector_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const res ip::Data, resip::TransactionState*> >*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*> >> = {<_Vector_alloc_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const resip::Data , resip::TransactionState*> >*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*>,true>> = {_M_start = 0x920bdd10, _M_finish = 0x920c9d14, _M_end_of_storage = 0x920c9d14}, <No data fields>}, <No data fields> }, _M_num_elements = 1998}}} (gdb) p (EnSipStack->myStack->mTransactionController->mServerTransactionMap) warning: can't find class named `resip::SipStack', as given by C++ RTTI $2 = {mMap = {_M_ht = {_M_node_allocator = {<No data fields>}, _M_hash = {<No data fields>}, _M_equals = {<binary_function<resip::Data,resip::Data,bool>> = {<No data f ields>}, <No data fields>}, _M_get_key = {<unary_function<std::pair<const resip::Data, resip::Transact ionState*>,const resip::Data>> = {<No data fields>}, <No data fields>}, _M_buckets = {<_Vector_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const res ip::Data, resip::TransactionState*> >*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*> >> = {<_Vector_alloc_base<__gnu_cxx::_Hashtable_node<std::pair<const resip::Data , resip::TransactionState*> >*,std::allocator<resip::TransactionState*>,true>> = {_M_start = 0x8cc3e790, _M_finish = 0x8cc567d4, _M_end_of_storage = 0x8cc567d4}, <No data fields>}, <No data fields> }, _M_num_elements = 10691}}} Thanks Frank Yuan Emergent-Netsolutions.com 972-359-6600 FrankYuan wrote: I am still working on it and will let you know as soon as I find anything related. Thanks Frank Yuan Emergent-Netsolutions.com 972-359-6600 Byron Campen wrote:This code was written long before my time here at resiprocate, so I do not know. To those who are in the know, is this a relic that can be safely done away with? Did you verify whether or not you had a genuine memory leak (this is something I am very interested to know)? Best regards, Byron CampenMy question why NoSize(0U-1) is used for mSize when clear func is called. mStateMachineFifo.size() may return either 0 or NoSize if the queue is empty. It should alway return 0 if the queue is empty and NoSize should not be used. NoSize causes confusion and is error prone. Thanks Frank Yuan Emergent-Netsolutions.com 972-359-6600 Jason Fischl wrote:On 9/20/06, Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:As for your questions about AbstractFifo, I am unsure why mSize is needed. Can anyone answer this (or, answer why clear is a no-op)?The clear method is virtual and gets defined in the subclasses. I believe that mSize is there as an optimization._______________________________________________ resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel |