Re: [reSIProcate] Is compact form of header field name supported?
It is not currently possible to ask the stack to emit compact headers.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Wenwei Xu
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 3:16 PM
> To: 'resiprocate-devel'
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Is compact form of header field name supported?
>
> Hi!
>
> We'd like to use compact form of header field name to reduce the size
> of message. We notice that the SIP stack can recognize the incoming
> messages with header field name in compact form. But is it possible
> that those field header names in outgoing messages are also in compact
> form? How do we this with reciprocate SIP stack?
>
> Thanks,
> Wenwei Xu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel