< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

[reSIProcate] Is compact form of header field name supported?


Hi!

We'd like to use compact form of header field name to reduce the size of
message. We notice that the SIP stack can recognize the incoming messages
with header field name in compact form. But is it possible that those field
header names in outgoing messages are also in compact form? How do we this
with reciprocate SIP stack?

Thanks,
Wenwei Xu