Re: [reSIProcate] Linking error

[Byron Campen <docfaraday@xxxxxxx>]

Sounds like we just need a dummy target. Something like 

MethodHash.cxx: check_gperf MethodHash.gperf

.

.

.

check_gperf:

<call gperf in some trivial way>

Now, as for nobody needing gperf, does that mean we should include all the generated code in the release?

Best regards,

Byron Campen

On 8/24/06, Byron Campen <docfaraday@xxxxxxx> wrote:

        Now, this brings up a point; does it make sense have the build check

for the presence of gperf before trying to generate MethodHash.cxx?

This build problem has wasted lots of time for many people.

Absolutely! If somebody can figure out how to do this, it would be

outstanding. In fact, nobody should need gperf unless they change the

gperf files.

Jason

_______________________________________________

resiprocate-devel mailing list

resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel