RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance
If any one whishes to perform some intensive testing I recommend
http://sipp.sourceforge.net/ very powerful and easy to use..
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nehal
Sent: viernes, 28 de julio de 2006 13:23
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Prasad Govindarajan'
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance
Hi,
As per below mail, processing time is 268 usec per message. Am I Right?
Could you please update us for CPU utilization while performing reciprocate
performance? Does it using both processors and the app is just running on one?
Also, was it one app bouncing the messages off of 127.0.0.1? If so is it really
twice as many packets/messages?
Please update us if you have more information.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks and Regards,
Nehal.
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy Agarwal
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:43 AM
To: Vishal K. Singh; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance
I got the head revision a couple of months ago and ran a test app which created
two stacks and made calls between them. This app was able to handle 372
calls/sec on Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) on a dual processor 2.8GHz Xeon
machine with 2GB of RAM.
Each call involved sending an INVITE from one instance of the stack to the
other and then receiving a 180 and 200OK response and then sending an ACK
followed by a BYE. So each call involved processing 10 SIP messages, hence you
could say 3,720 SIP msgs per second.
Test program is attached...
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vishal K.
Singh
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:18 PM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance
Hello Everyone,
Has anyone done some performance measurements with resiprocate stack or repro
proxy server ? It would be very helpful if you could share your performance
results.
How much is raw message processing capacity of the stack and of the DUM layer?
I am trying decide whether to use the stack or DUM and performance trade-offs.
Also, Is there any plan to change the DUM layer soon ?
Thanks a lot for your time.
Regards,
Vishal
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
__________ NOD32 1.1677 (20060724) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No
confidentiality
or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it and
kindly
notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy
any
part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of
Ydilo Advanced Voice Solutions, S.A. shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------