< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance


Hi,

As per below mail, processing time is 268 usec per message. Am I Right? 

Could you please update us for CPU utilization while performing reciprocate
performance?  Does it using both processors and the app is just running on
one?

Also, was it one app bouncing the messages off of 127.0.0.1? If so is it
really twice as many packets/messages?

Please update us if you have more information.

Thanks in advance.

Thanks and Regards,
Nehal. 


-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andy
Agarwal
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:43 AM
To: Vishal K. Singh; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

I got the head revision a couple of months ago and ran a test app which
created two stacks and made calls between them. This app was able to
handle 372 calls/sec on Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) on a dual processor
2.8GHz Xeon machine with 2GB of RAM.

Each call involved sending an INVITE from one instance of the stack to
the other and then receiving a 180 and 200OK response and then sending
an ACK followed by a BYE. So each call involved processing 10 SIP
messages, hence you could say 3,720 SIP msgs per second.

Test program is attached...




-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Vishal K. Singh
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:18 PM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

Hello Everyone,

Has anyone done some performance measurements with resiprocate stack or
repro proxy server ? It would be very helpful if you could share your
performance results.

How much is raw message processing capacity of the stack and of the DUM
layer?

I am trying decide whether to use the stack or DUM and performance
trade-offs.

Also, Is there any plan to change the DUM layer soon ?

Thanks a lot for your time.

Regards,
Vishal
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel



__________ NOD32 1.1677 (20060724) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com