RE: [reSIProcate] Sending 183 with SDP body
Ah - the inbound INVITE had an Supported: 100rel header. I should work
if this header isn't present (ie. UAS_Offer state).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Jason Fischl
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 12:15 AM
> To: Jeremy Geras
> Cc: Scott Godin; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Sending 183 with SDP body
>
> I have worked on the reliable provisional aspects of the UAC state
> machine. Have it mostly done and partially tested. It should get
> checked in within a month.
>
> On 7/9/06, Jeremy Geras <jgeras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I am using the SVN head (rev 6364)...
> >
> > Looking at ServerInviteSession.cxx, line 266, provideAnswer(..), I
> see
> > the
> > following:
> >
> > case UAS_OfferReliable:
> > // send1XX-answer, timer::1xx
> > transition(UAS_FirstEarlyReliable);
> > break;
> >
> > Looking at this, and looking at the state machine diagrams in the
> docs
> > folder, I'm guessing the intention was to actually have the stack
> send
> > the 1xx at this point and that the implementation of this just isn't
> > completed yet?
> >
> > If that's the case -- anyone working on this now?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Jeremy -
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Scott Godin [mailto:slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 3:56 PM
> > > To: 'Jeremy Geras'; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] Sending 183 with SDP body
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure this working in the SVN head version. What
version
> > > are you using?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of
> > > Jeremy Geras
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 9:18 PM
> > > To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [reSIProcate] Sending 183 with SDP body
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Using DUM, is it possible to send a 183 with SDP body?
> > >
> > > It looks like it's invalid to do sis->provideAnswer(..) followed
by
> > > sis->provisional(183)...
> > >
> > > Is there some other way that I'm overlooking?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > - Jeremy -
> > >
> > > Jeremy Geras
> > > Software Developer,
> > > NewHeights Software
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >