RE: [reSIProcate] Sending 183 with SDP body

["Jeremy Geras" <jgeras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am using the SVN head (rev 6364)...

Looking at ServerInviteSession.cxx, line 266, provideAnswer(..), I see the
following:

      case UAS_OfferReliable: 
         // send1XX-answer, timer::1xx
         transition(UAS_FirstEarlyReliable);
         break;

Looking at this, and looking at the state machine diagrams in the docs
folder, I'm guessing the intention was to actually have the stack send the
1xx at this point and that the implementation of this just isn't completed
yet?

If that's the case -- anyone working on this now?

Thanks,
 - Jeremy - 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Godin [mailto:slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 3:56 PM
> To: 'Jeremy Geras'; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] Sending 183 with SDP body
> 
> I'm pretty sure this working in the SVN head version.  What 
> version are you using?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Jeremy Geras
> Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 9:18 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Sending 183 with SDP body
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Using DUM, is it possible to send a 183 with SDP body?
> 
> It looks like it's invalid to do sis->provideAnswer(..) followed by
> sis->provisional(183)...
> 
> Is there some other way that I'm overlooking?
> 
> Thanks,
>  - Jeremy -
> 
> Jeremy Geras
> Software Developer,
> NewHeights Software
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> 
>