RE: [reSIProcate] Finding the correct DialogID to get the InviteSession

["Kovar, William (Bill)" <bkovar@xxxxxxxxx>]

Assuming that persisting DialogId is not going to work....

 

Is there some way to get the InviteSession if I have a CallId??

 

Bill Kovar

ECAD R&D - IC Advocate and Workflow

Avaya Inc.

(732) 852-2609

bkovar@xxxxxxxxx

 

---

From: Scott Godin [mailto:slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:33 AM
To: Kovar, William (Bill); resiprocate-devel
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] Finding the correct DialogID to get the InviteSession

Why are passing the DialogId class itself to the findInviteSession call?  Did you mean something like:  mdum->findInviteSession(the_map[refid])?

 

What line is giving you the compiler error?

 

Scott

 

---

From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kovar, William (Bill)
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 6:27 PM
To: resiprocate-devel
Subject: [reSIProcate] Finding the correct DialogID to get the InviteSession

 

I'm building a multiple UA server that receives 3rd party commands that contain a Uri and refid.

 

A top layer maps Uri->UA to find the UA. But I can't seem to figure out what to persist in my UA to find the correct dialog to act on. My UA may have multiple active sessions.

 

If I map inside the UA as such:

std::map<unsigned long refid, DialogId> the_map;

and then add to the map

the_map[refid] = ish->getAppDialog()->getDialogID();

and then do:

mdum->findInviteSession(DialogId);

 

Compiler complains about no appropriate copy constructor on resip::DialogId.

 

Should I modify class DialogId to have a copy constructor or is there another way around this? Or does the DialogUsageManager have some goodies for me to use to find the correct session inside one UA.

 

Any alternatives to findInviteSession() ??

 

Any suggestions??

 

Bill Kovar

bkovar@xxxxxxxxx