| < Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
| Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
|
Why are passing the DialogId class itself
to the findInviteSession call? Did you mean something like:
mdum->findInviteSession(the_map[refid])? What line is giving you the compiler
error? Scott From:
resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kovar, William (Bill) I'm building a multiple UA server that receives 3rd party
commands that contain a Uri and refid. A top layer maps Uri->UA to find the UA. But I can't
seem to figure out what to persist in my UA to find the correct dialog to act
on. My UA may have multiple active sessions. If I map inside the UA as such: std::map<unsigned long refid,
DialogId> the_map; and then add to the map the_map[refid] =
ish->getAppDialog()->getDialogID(); and then do: mdum->findInviteSession(DialogId); Compiler complains about no appropriate copy constructor on
resip::DialogId. Should I modify class DialogId to have a copy constructor or
is there another way around this? Or does the DialogUsageManager have some
goodies for me to use to find the correct session inside one UA. Any alternatives to findInviteSession() ?? Any suggestions?? Bill Kovar |