Re: [reSIProcate] Source difference between Subversion Source Code Browser & Public Tarball Archives
Hi Alan,
Thank you for your quick response, and i think it's the fastest
one in any dev-mailing list.
Now I can see those difference between codebases, but i'm confuesd
with new interactive configuration system, it keep using the gcc
compiler when build contrib/ares instead of my ARM-cross compiler, but
using my ARM-cross compiler for building others (even fails).
Seems there is some tricky stuff I need to figure out with new SVN codebase.
But resiprocate is still awesome.
2006/3/21, Alan Hawrylyshen <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On 2006.03.19, at 20:44 , Joe Liao wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> > I have been using the resiprocate-0.9.0-5019.tar.gz from Public
> > Tarball Archives for a while and works well, but I need to integrating
> > the STUN support into current application.
> > From what i saw , there are STUN stack and test code under
> > Subversion Source Code Browser , which locate at
> > /main/resip/stack/stun and main/rutil/stun.
> > But it seems many difference beween two source code
> > architecture , can anyone give me some hints that how to integrate
> > these functionality between two source code or what's the relation
> > between them?
>
> You should migrate to the SVN codebase instead. There was a re-org
> last summer of the file layout.
> We need to release an updated tarball shortly, but at this point, you
> will find it less painful to update your entire stack.
>
> Thanks
> Alan
>
>
>