RE: [reSIProcate] Source difference between Subversion Source CodeBrowser & Public Tarball Archives

["Matthias Moetje - TERASENS GmbH" <moetje@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Joe,

the STUN stuff was moved from the stack to rutil. You should
get the current version to a clean location.

Currently UdpTransport supports a STUN server implementation
(STUN requests to the SIP port are processed and answered).

STUN client support is also available (in stun.hxx) but the 
problem is that the stun client requests must be sent from 
the same socket that the stack is working on. I am currently 
working to implement STUN client functionality in the 
UdpTransport class.

Best regards,

Matthias Moetje


> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Joe Liao
> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 3:44 AM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [reSIProcate] Source difference between Subversion 
> Source CodeBrowser & Public Tarball Archives
> 
> Hello All,
>        I have been using the resiprocate-0.9.0-5019.tar.gz 
> from Public Tarball Archives for a while and works well, but 
> I need to integrating the STUN support into current application.
>        From what i saw , there are STUN stack and test code 
> under Subversion Source Code Browser , which locate at 
> /main/resip/stack/stun and main/rutil/stun.
>        But it seems many difference beween two source code 
> architecture , can anyone give me some hints that how to 
> integrate these functionality between two source code or 
> what's the relation between them?
> 
> Best Regards,
> Joe
>