RE: [reSIProcate] should CANCEL or BYE after 183?
You can get DUM to send a cancel - by calling AppDialogSet::end()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-
> devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Christian_Gavin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 1:10 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [reSIProcate] should CANCEL or BYE after 183?
>
> Hi,
>
> I tested calling a PSTN gateway both from EyeBeam and from my client
> application (based on resiprocate 0.9 and DUM). I noticed EyeBeam will
> send
> a CANCEL whereas resiprocate 0.9 with DUM will send a BYE. The BYE,
even
> though it seems properly constructed (with to and from tags), gets
> rejected
> by the gateway (481 Call Leg / Transaction doesn't exist). However,
the
> CANCEL sent by EyeBeam properly terminates the INVITE. The gateway is
> running Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
>
> According to RFC 3261, who is right? EyeBeam or resiprocate 0.9 or are
> both
> doing the right thing ? Also, it doesn't seem there is any way to send
a
> CANCEL with DUM.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel