RE: [reSIProcate] INVITE and re-INVITE without SDP, how can I share the improves ?
Hi,
I looked at all dum*.dot files - I'm working one of the latest svn checkedout
version and it looks like there are many small bugs in the dot files (for
example there are two states 'Finish' and 'Finished' that look exactly the
same). I'm working on fixing these files and also on creating visio diagrams
for them (soon I'll send them)...
Is there a newer version of those files?
Rodrigo,
Did you change the state machine for allowing the INVITE and re-INVITE without
SDP transmission? (Did you use 'transition' function or any InviteSession
state/event?)
Can you send a small description of the changes you made?
Did you change only the ClientInviteSession constructor or anything else?
Are you sure that the problem occurred only when you didn't send initial SDP?
Anyone else encountered that problem and fixed it?
Thanks,
Micky
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Godin
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 5:58 PM
To: Rodrigo Alcoberro; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] INVITE and re-INVITE without SDP,how can I share the
improves ?
Great!
I think a discussion of your new Invite session state transitions would be a
good place to start. Posting a modified dum\doc\dum-invite-connected-state.dot
and dum-clientinvite-state.dot file would probably be the best way. Also a
brief description of the modified/added interfaces would be good.
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rodrigo
Alcoberro
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:41 AM
To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate] INVITE and re-INVITE without SDP,how can I share the
improves ?
Hello,
I have done some improves to DUM to allow the INVITE and re-INVITE without SDP
transmission.
How can I share them with you ?
Best regards
Rodrigo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [SMTP:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rodrigo
> Alcoberro
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 16:46
> To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] Re-INVITE without SDP
>
> Thank you for the prompt answer Scott,
> I´m trying to add this capability because is very usefull for us. The
> re-INVITE message goes without SDP now but I think the state machine keep in
> a "offering" (wrong) state. I´m viewing it in detail just now.
> Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions.
>
> Also, I have seen that the resiprocate release (0.9.0-5019) had a problem
> with the initial INVITE without SDP, I fixed it doing in
> ClientInviteSession.cxx, Line 32 (inside ClientInviteSession constructor)
>
> if(initialOffer)
> mProposedLocalSdp = InviteSession::makeSdp(*initialOffer)
>
>
> Then, If const SdpContents * initialOffer == 0 don´t construct the SDP.
> I´m have been using it for a month.
>
>
> Thank you very much
> Rodrigo
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Godin [SMTP:slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:50
> > To: Rodrigo Alcoberro; resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] Re-INVITE without SDP
> >
> > Great question! Currently this is not possible if you are using the DUM
> > layer. All re-invites will carry an SDP.
> >
> > This does seem like a good interface to add though. :)
> >
> > Note: The current DUM is even broken on receiving a re-invites with no
> > offer. However a fix for this problem is currently being worked on.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rodrigo
> > Alcoberro
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:10 AM
> > To: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [reSIProcate] Re-INVITE without SDP
> >
> > Hello,
> > I´m working in a system that requires a B2BUA re-inviting without SDP to
> > the caller party forcing it to send a SDP offer in the 200 OK message. Is
> > it possible to do that with DUM or resiprocate ?
> >
> > Thank you and best regards
> >
> >
> >
> > Rodrigo Alcoberro
> > Ingeniero de Desarrollo
> > Project Leader
> >
> > ATS Advanced Technology Solutions
> > Av. Corrientes 880 Piso 11
> > C1043AAV - Buenos Aires - Argentina
> > Tel: +54-11-6393-4345 / Fax: +54-11-6393-4300 ext. 485
> > Web: www.ats-connection.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel