Re: [reSIProcate] directory reorg
I'm all for letting the 7.0 users fend for themselves :)
On 8/18/05, Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'll try creating some VS.NET project files for everything tomorrow.
>
> One thing I would like to change - is the current support for VS.NET 7.0,
> 7.1 and 8.0 project files. It is just too difficult to maintain all three
> versions. 8.0 files are definitely NOT required, since 7.1 files are easily
> opened in VS.NET 2005. I prefer to just support 7.1 version - since I don't
> have access to the older 7.0 version of .NET - but this could be problematic
> for people still using the 7.0 version. Does anyone else have any opinions
> on this subject?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fischl
> jason
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:02 PM
> Cc: resiprocate
> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] directory reorg
>
> Ok. I've created a branch at:
> https://scm.sipfoundry.org/rep/resiprocate/branches/b-directory-reorg
>
> Please check it out and see if it builds for you. There are still some
> minor tweaks to be done but it should all compile and link for you.
> The goal is to merge this back to main really soon now before anything
> else gets checked into main. So please take a look asap.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On 8/18/05, Derek MacDonald <derek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > One amendment: resip/sip will be resip/stack.
> >
> > --Derek
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-
> > > devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of david Butcher
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:33 PM
> > > To: Adam Roach
> > > Cc: resiprocate; jason@xxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] directory reorg
> > >
> > > I am ok with this suggestion.
> > >
> > > david
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/18/05, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > I have no strong concerns with this proposal.
> > > >
> > > > /a
> > > >
> > > > Fischl jason wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Ok, here's the latest proposal. Please look at this carefully. The
> > > > >main difference from the previous proposal is that util is moved up
> to
> > > > >the toplevel and called rutil. dns is moved into a subdirectory of
> > > > >rutil. both rutil and rutil/dns remain in the resip namespace.
> > > > >
> > > > >proposed revised structure:
> > > > >
> > > > ># where the custom Makefile stuff goes (toplevel)
> > > > >build
> > > > >
> > > > ># where the 3rd party depencies go (toplevel)
> > > > >contrib
> > > > >
> > > > >resip/dum
> > > > >resip/dum/test
> > > > >resip/sip
> > > > >resip/sip/test
> > > > >
> > > > ># the util library - still in namespace resip
> > > > >rutil
> > > > >rutil/test
> > > > >rutil/dns
> > > > >rutil/dns/test
> > > > >
> > > > ># toplevel
> > > > >repro
> > > > >repro/test
> > > > >
> > > > ># toplevel
> > > > >tfm
> > > > >tfm/test
> > > > >
> > > > ># msrp would also be toplevel but still in the same svn repository
> > > > >msrp
> > > > >msrp/test
> > > > >
> > > > >Here is what would go in the rutil directory:
> > > > >AbstractFifo.hxx IntrusiveListElement.hxx Socket.hxx
> > > > >AsyncProcessHandler.hxx Lock.hxx Subsystem.hxx
> > > > >BaseException.hxx Lockable.hxx SysLogBuf.hxx
> > > > >CircularBuffer.hxx Log.hxx SysLogStream.hxx
> > > > >Coders.hxx Logger.hxx ThreadIf.hxx
> > > > >Condition.hxx MD5Stream.hxx TimeLimitFifo.hxx
> > > > >CountStream.hxx Mutex.hxx Timer.hxx
> > > > >Data.hxx ParseBuffer.hxx TransportType.hxx
> > > > >DataStream.hxx Poll.hxx Tuple.hxx
> > > > >DnsUtil.hxx RWMutex.hxx WinCompat.hxx
> > > > >Fifo.hxx Random.hxx WinLeakCheck.hxx
> > > > >FileSystem.hxx RecursiveMutex.hxx compat.hxx
> > > > >FiniteFifo.hxx SHA1Stream.hxx vmd5.hxx
> > > > >HashMap.hxx SelectInterruptor.hxx vthread.hxx
> > > > >HeapInstanceCounter.hxx SharedCount.hxx
> > > > >Inserter.hxx SharedPtr.hxx
> > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > >resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > > >resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
>