< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

RE: [reSIProcate] directory reorg


I'll try creating some VS.NET project files for everything tomorrow.

One thing I would like to change - is the current support for VS.NET 7.0,
7.1 and 8.0 project files.  It is just too difficult to maintain all three
versions.  8.0 files are definitely NOT required, since 7.1 files are easily
opened in VS.NET 2005.  I prefer to just support 7.1 version - since I don't
have access to the older 7.0 version of .NET - but this could be problematic
for people still using the 7.0 version.  Does anyone else have any opinions
on this subject?

Thanks,

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fischl
jason
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:02 PM
Cc: resiprocate
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] directory reorg

Ok. I've created a branch at:
https://scm.sipfoundry.org/rep/resiprocate/branches/b-directory-reorg

Please check it out and see if it builds for you. There are still some
minor tweaks to be done but it should all compile and link for you.
The goal is to merge this back to main really soon now before anything
else gets checked into main. So please take a look asap.

Jason



On 8/18/05, Derek MacDonald <derek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> One amendment:  resip/sip will be resip/stack.
> 
> --Derek
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-
> > devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of david Butcher
> > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:33 PM
> > To: Adam Roach
> > Cc: resiprocate; jason@xxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] directory reorg
> >
> > I am ok with this suggestion.
> >
> > david
> >
> >
> > On 8/18/05, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I have no strong concerns with this proposal.
> > >
> > > /a
> > >
> > > Fischl jason wrote:
> > >
> > > >Ok, here's the latest proposal. Please look at this carefully. The
> > > >main difference from the previous proposal is that util is moved up
to
> > > >the toplevel and called rutil. dns is moved into a subdirectory of
> > > >rutil. both rutil and rutil/dns remain in the resip namespace.
> > > >
> > > >proposed revised structure:
> > > >
> > > ># where the custom Makefile stuff goes (toplevel)
> > > >build
> > > >
> > > ># where the 3rd party depencies go (toplevel)
> > > >contrib
> > > >
> > > >resip/dum
> > > >resip/dum/test
> > > >resip/sip
> > > >resip/sip/test
> > > >
> > > ># the util library - still in namespace resip
> > > >rutil
> > > >rutil/test
> > > >rutil/dns
> > > >rutil/dns/test
> > > >
> > > ># toplevel
> > > >repro
> > > >repro/test
> > > >
> > > ># toplevel
> > > >tfm
> > > >tfm/test
> > > >
> > > ># msrp would also be toplevel but still in the same svn repository
> > > >msrp
> > > >msrp/test
> > > >
> > > >Here is what would go in the rutil directory:
> > > >AbstractFifo.hxx         IntrusiveListElement.hxx  Socket.hxx
> > > >AsyncProcessHandler.hxx  Lock.hxx                  Subsystem.hxx
> > > >BaseException.hxx        Lockable.hxx              SysLogBuf.hxx
> > > >CircularBuffer.hxx       Log.hxx                   SysLogStream.hxx
> > > >Coders.hxx               Logger.hxx                ThreadIf.hxx
> > > >Condition.hxx            MD5Stream.hxx             TimeLimitFifo.hxx
> > > >CountStream.hxx          Mutex.hxx                 Timer.hxx
> > > >Data.hxx                 ParseBuffer.hxx           TransportType.hxx
> > > >DataStream.hxx           Poll.hxx                  Tuple.hxx
> > > >DnsUtil.hxx              RWMutex.hxx               WinCompat.hxx
> > > >Fifo.hxx                 Random.hxx                WinLeakCheck.hxx
> > > >FileSystem.hxx           RecursiveMutex.hxx        compat.hxx
> > > >FiniteFifo.hxx           SHA1Stream.hxx            vmd5.hxx
> > > >HashMap.hxx              SelectInterruptor.hxx     vthread.hxx
> > > >HeapInstanceCounter.hxx  SharedCount.hxx
> > > >Inserter.hxx             SharedPtr.hxx
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > >resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> 
> 
>
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel