Re: [reSIProcate] directory reorg
Okey-doke. I am ok with keeping os and util together, as long as it is
named util. I just blew it on repro -- should be parallel to resip.
Apologies for leaving out tfm.
david
On 8/16/05, Fischl jason <jason.fischl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A few comments:
> - repro should be parallel to resip
> - don't see the value of os - just put it all in util
>
> proposed revised structure:
>
> # where the custom Makefile stuff goes (toplevel)
> build
>
> # where the 3rd party depencies go (toplevel)
> contrib
>
> resip/dns
> resip/dns/test
> resip/dum
> resip/dum/test
> resip/sip
> resip/sip/test
> resip/util
> resip/util/test
>
> # toplevel
> repro
> repro/test
>
> # toplevel
> tfm
> tfm/test
>
> # msrp would also be toplevel but still in the same svn repository
> msrp
> msrp/test
>
>
> On 8/16/05, david Butcher <davidlbutcher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We haven't picked at this scab for a while. I would like to propose a
> > directory structure for resiprocate.
> >
> > resip/dns
> > resip/dns/test
> > resip/dum
> > resip/dum/test
> > resip/os
> > resip/os/test
> > resip/repro
> > resip/repro/test
> > resip/sip
> > resip/sip/test
> > resip/util
> > resip/util/test
> >
> > My understanding is that msrp is off in its own repository.
> >
> > Things to notice:
> > - the stack proper is in repro/sip
> > - os and util are separated
> > -- Mutex, Condition, etc. will be in resip/os
> > -- Data, DataStream, ParseBuffer, etc. are in resip/util
> > - tests are separated
> >
> > david
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >
>