[reSIProcate] Fwd: [Sip-implementors] Resiprocate vs VOCAL
Cullen, Alan,
Can you answer the first question?
For the recent support of SIP extension, I suggest to
use Resiprocate instead of VOCAL.
kaiduan
--- Giuseppe Teresi <giuseppe.Teresi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:48:19 +0000
> From: Giuseppe Teresi <giuseppe.Teresi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Resiprocate vs VOCAL
>
> hi all,
>
> I am interested to develop a SIP UA with QoS
> enhancement using the
> Resiprocate SIP Stack or the VOCAL SIP Stack, but
> first I would want to
> know why the Resiprocate is under VOCAL license and
> if VOCAL libraries
> can be used to develop an UA with support the recent
> SIP extension (e.g.
> offer/ansewer model, PRACK, RFC 3312, RFC 3313.....)
>
> someone can help me?
>
> tanks in advance. best regards
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com