[reSIProcate] RE: [repro-users] Registrations with to tag are rejected
I haven't yet - but I will. Are there any problems caused by the to tag
being present? If not - I would suggest that we be less stringent - in
order to be able to support more (buggy) end devices. :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Rohan Mahy [mailto:rohan@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Scott Godin
Cc: repro-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rohan Mahy;
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [repro-users] Registrations with to tag are rejected
Hi Scott,
Rather than silently reinforce the broken behavior, have you at least
brought this bug to their attention? They may be willing to fix their
registrations.
thanks,
-rohan
On Jul 4, 2005, at 7:33, Scott Godin wrote:
> I noticed that registrations containing a to tag are discarded by
> DialogUsageManager processRequest:
>
> makeResponse(failure, request, 400, "Registration requests can't have
> To:
> tags.");
>
> I know this is to spec, but I have some IPDialog devices that are
> sending
> registration refreshes and unregister requests with a to tag. Do you
> think
> it would be harmful to just accept these requests, despite the fact
> that
> they are incorrect?
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> repro-users mailing list
> repro-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/repro-users