Re: [reSIProcate] RE: Boost and resiprocate

[Bryan Ogawa <bko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On May 27, 2005, at 11:24 AM, Jon Ringle wrote:

> On Friday 27 May 2005 14:11, Derek MacDonald wrote:
> > I would rather we lift a standard(and soon to be *the* standard) 
> > smart ptr
> > that is well tested rather than using the vocal smart ptr.  Also, I 
> > don't
> > think the vocal smart ptr has nice cast operators/etc.
>
> I agree. I believe that the boost family of smart ptr have been more
> thoroughly tested with a wider set of applications that the home-grown 
> vocal
> smart ptr.

Since I don't contribute to resiprocate, I realize my opinion is not 
important, but as an author of the vocal smart pointer, I suggest you 
use boost's smart pointer if you need a smart pointer.

Vocal's smart pointer wants to be boost's smart pointer when it grows 
up.