| < Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
| < Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
On Friday 27 May 2005 14:11, Derek MacDonald wrote: > I would rather we lift a standard(and soon to be *the* standard) smart ptr > that is well tested rather than using the vocal smart ptr. Also, I don't > think the vocal smart ptr has nice cast operators/etc. I agree. I believe that the boost family of smart ptr have been more thoroughly tested with a wider set of applications that the home-grown vocal smart ptr. Jon