Re: [reSIProcate] RE: Boost and resiprocate
I think one of the resiprocate's design philosophy is
to be self-contained at the beginning (it only depends
on ARES). I still prefer to use VOVCAL's
implementation for smart pointer, I have not found any
reason why VOCAL's implementation can not be used for
this case. Scott, can you take a look at VOCAL's
implementation.
Best Regards,
kaiduan
--- Scott Godin <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This might not be a bad plan. I think there are
> differing opinions amongst
> the resip developers on this one. If this does
> indeed become generally
> accepted at some time, then it won't take make to
> switch all references from
> the resip namespace shared pointer to the boost one.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Mutch [mailto:kmutch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:31 AM
> To: slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Boost and resiprocate
>
> For the longer term outlook would it not be better
> to more widely adopt
> boost
> once the May release is complete as specific
> components such as the smart
> pointers
> are up for review by the standards committee and are
> likely to pass through
> into the standard?
>
> Thanks
> Karl
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
______________________________________________________________________
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca