[reSIProcate] RE: Boost and resiprocate

["Scott Godin" <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This might not be a bad plan.  I think there are differing opinions amongst
the resip developers on this one.  If this does indeed become generally
accepted at some time, then it won't take make to switch all references from
the resip namespace shared pointer to the boost one.

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Mutch [mailto:kmutch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:31 AM
To: slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Boost and resiprocate

For the longer term outlook would it not be better to more widely adopt
boost
once the May release is complete as specific components such as the smart
pointers
are up for review by the standards committee and are likely to pass through 
into the standard?

Thanks
Karl