Thanks for the feedback Cullen! I
agree and have commit this change.
From: Cullen Jennings
[mailto:fluffy@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005
11:08 PM
To: Scott Godin;
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate]
Received Parameter In Via Header
I don't have any strong feelings one way or another but making the messages
smaller is not bad and I think this would make it more like what other people
do so I guess I am mildly in favor of this.
On 1/28/05 8:57 AM, "Scott Godin" <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Guys,
Quick question, during testing at Nortel, they noticed that we always insert a
received parameter into the Via header. Technically this parameter is not
required if the sent-by portion of the Via contains an IP address and it is the
same as the one that message was received on. Does anyone think it would
be worth while for me to make a check and only add the received parameter if it
differs from the sent-by parameter?
Technically it's not illegal to add it, like we do - but I guess it's
redundant. Any thoughts?
Scott Godin
Research and Development
Computer Talk Technology
slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
905-882-5000 and 'Say my name'
or x127
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel