Re: [reSIProcate] Received Parameter In Via Header

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [reSIProcate] Received Parameter In Via Header

I don't have any strong feelings one way or another but making the messages smaller is not bad and I think this would make it more like what other people do so I guess I am mildly in favor of this.


On 1/28/05 8:57 AM, "Scott Godin" <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Guys,
 
Quick question, during testing at Nortel, they noticed that we always insert a received parameter into the Via header.  Technically this parameter is not required if the sent-by portion of the Via contains an IP address and it is the same as the one that message was received on.  Does anyone think it would be worth while for me to make a check and only add the received parameter if it differs from the sent-by parameter?
 
Technically it's not illegal to add it, like we do - but I guess it's redundant.  Any thoughts?
 
 
Scott Godin

Research and Development

Computer Talk Technology

slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx

905-882-5000 and 'Say my name' or x127

---

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel