Re: [reSIProcate] Security class and root certificates
On 12/6/04 4:52 PM, "Bob Bramwell" <bob@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just been looking over the newly revamped Security and BaseSecurity classes
> and
> I have a couple of questions.
>
> Obviously my setRootCert (addRootCertPEM) implementation did not meet with
> universal approval (no big surprise really) but can someone suggest what needs
> to be done to fix it? Or is someone else planning to? We're going to need
> that
> facility back before we can use the new code.
>
> Secondly, is there any particular reason why every (Base)Security object needs
> its own copy of the root certificates? Why shouldn't they all share a common
> pool?
>
> Thanks,
> Bob.
bob - I know I own you an answer on this but I just keep failing to get the
time to give you a phone call and understand what you want to do