Re: [reSIProcate] Fw: Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
If you make the AppDialogSet (not AppDialog) it will be created when
you make it and you can call cancel on it at any time.
On 5/10/07, Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx
<Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>You would need to create your own AppDialogSet and pass into the
makeInviteSession call.
Ok.
But ,as I understand, AppDialog creating only after provisional (or any 1XX)
received?
Am I right?Or you mean something else?
What should I do?
Thanks.
----- Forwarded by Volodymyr Stepanov/R&D Ukraine on 10.05.2007 18:25 -----
Volodymyr Stepanov/R&D Ukraine
10.05.2007 10:19
To <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject Fw: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
----- Forwarded by Volodymyr Stepanov/R&D Ukraine on 10.05.2007 10:18 -----
Volodymyr Stepanov/R&D Ukraine
10.05.2007 10:18
To "Scott Godin" <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject RE: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.Link
But on this stage I don't have valid invite session :(
resip::InviteSessionHandle handle =
m_pDum->findInviteSession(*m_currOutgInviteId);
if (handle.isValid())
{
DebugLog(<< "CSipWorker::HangCall: handle.isValid() -
handle->getAppDialogSet()->end()");
handle->getAppDialogSet()->end();
DebugLog(<< "CSipWorker::HangCall: handle.isValid() -
handle->getAppDialogSet()->end() finished");
}
else if (m_outgInviteMsg && !m_outgInviteMsg->isInvalid()
&& m_outgInviteMsg->isRequest()
&& (pSession->GetState() != eUnreachable)
&& (pSession->GetState() != eBusy)
&& (pSession->GetState() != eDisconnected))
{
std::cout<<"CSipWorker::HangCall: Send cancel";
resip::SipMessage* pCancelMessage =
resip::Helper::makeCancel(*m_outgInviteMsg);
resip::SharedPtr<resip::SipMessage>
pShCancelMessage(pCancelMessage);
m_pDum->send(pShCancelMessage);
m_outgInviteMsg = NULL;
DebugLog(<< "CSipWorker::HangCall: Send cancel
finished");
}
Is it completely wrong?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Volodymyr Stepanov
MSN : stepanov_v_m@xxxxxxxxxxx
ICQ : 272708933
"Scott Godin" <slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
08.05.2007 16:48
To <Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Byron Campen" <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject RE: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
If you use AppDialogSet::end() to CANCEL the call end this is all taken care of
for you:
https://www.resiprocate.org/DUM_Ending_an_Invite_Session
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 3:28 AM
To: Byron Campen
Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
if (m_outgInviteMsg && !m_outgInviteMsg->isInvalid()
&& m_outgInviteMsg->isRequest()
&& (pSession->GetState() != eUnreachable)
&& (pSession->GetState() != eBusy)
&& (pSession->GetState() != eDisconnected))
{
std::cout<<"CSipWorker::HangCall: Send cancel";
resip::SipMessage* pCancelMessage =
resip::Helper::makeCancel(*m_outgInviteMsg);
resip::SharedPtr<resip::SipMessage>
pShCancelMessage(pCancelMessage);
m_pDum->send(pShCancelMessage);
m_outgInviteMsg = NULL;
DebugLog(<< "CSipWorker::HangCall: Send cancel
finished");
}
That's all application do to signal about tear down the call.(maybe something
erong here too? :) )
Probably I should change my app architecture to provide ability to send "some sort
of note-to-self to send a CANCEL once a provisional comes in",
Best regards,
MSN : stepanov_v_m@xxxxxxxxxxx
ICQ : 272708933
Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
07.05.2007 23:24
To Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject Re: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
What is your app doing to signal its intent to tear down the call?
Best regards,
Byron Campen
Yes,I'm using DUM ...
Any suggestions?
Best regards,
Volodymyr Stepanov
Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
04.05.2007 18:05
To Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc resiprocate-devel <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject Re: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
Are you using DUM? I got the impression that this was not the case.
Best regards,
Byron Campen
FYI - DUM should be handling all of this.
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Byron
Campen
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:44 AM
To: Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
If you are going to freeze the CANCEL transaction, it needs to be
done at the TU. So, if your app decides to end a call, it needs to put some
sort of note-to-self to send a CANCEL once a provisional comes in, and if a
final response comes in, to send a BYE.
Best regards,
Byron Campen
Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
04.05.2007 16:53
To Volodymyr.Stepanov@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject Re: [reSIProcate] Fw: CANCEL before provisional recieved.
Sending a CANCEL before a provisional response is invalid behavior. Right now,
the stack forges a CANCEL/200 and sends it to the TU, but does not allow the
CANCEL to hit the wire. From here, if B never sends a provisional, the INVITE
transaction will time-out, causing the stack to send a simulated INVITE/408.
However, if B does respond, the call will continue normally. (This is something
a TU must be prepared to handle; just because you get a CANCEL/200 doesn't mean
the remote UAS will end the INVITE transaction.) If B does send a provisional,
but never sends a final response, it is up to A to decide at what point it
wishes to end the transaction. (The TU does this by sending a CANCEL; this will
cause the stack to put a CANCEL on the wire, and start a timer that will cause
the INVITE transaction to be torn down, if it never gets a response)
Best regards,
Byron Campen
Lets try again :)
B sends provisional,but there is large time gap between A INVITEs and B
receives this INVITE, and answers back.
I know that sending CANCEL before provisional is incorrect.
I trying to find "standart" solution for ,maybe, waiting for provisional or
"freeze" CANCEL transaction.
Maybe there is another way to deal with my problem?
Thanks.
Sorry :)
MSN : stepanov_v_m@xxxxxxxxxxx
ICQ : 272708933_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
<smime.p7s>
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel