[reSIProcate] OpenSSL 1.1.0 / non-backwards-compatible API changes

Karlsson boost.regex at gmail.com
Fri Oct 20 03:36:26 CDT 2017


Hi Daniel,

Does the last reSIProcate is support OpenSSL 1.1.x now ?

Thanks

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.pro> wrote:

>
>
> On 18/11/16 14:44, Scott Godin wrote:
> > I think it makes sense to keep resip trunk instep with the latest
> > OpenSSL.  We can endeavor to be backwards compatible whenever the effort
> > is reasonable.
> >
>
> I did a test build with the OpenSSL 1.1.0c headers
>
> There are many errors, but many are repeated due to the same things
> being included over and over again in many places.  This makes it
> identify how much work is really involved in this change.
>
> Just building the rutil directory only gives a very small handful of
> errors, so maybe fixing those will fix a lot of the errors that appear
> building other parts of the code.
>
> Thinking about the bigger picture:
>
> - OpenSSL 1.0.x will still be officially support for some years
> https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html
>
> - RHEL7 users will still be on OpenSSL 1.0.x for some time
>
> - Debian appears to be considering releasing both 1.0.2 and 1.1.x due to
> the fact so many packages won't support 1.1.x yet
>
> - Ubuntu and Fedora don't appear to be going fully 1.1.x until at least
> the end of next year
>
> So maybe we can make this change more gradually and not included in 1.11.0
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20171020/830c8419/attachment.htm>


More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list