[reSIProcate] generate generic pidf

[Mateus Bellomo]

I found out that it is giving a warning. So can I change the method to
return a list reference instead of a const?

2016-07-18 18:04 GMT-03:00 Scott Godin <slgodin at gmail.com>:

> I'm surprised it compiles.
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Mateus Bellomo <mateusbellomo at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hmm...that's weird. I haven't noticed that and I didn't add a non-const
>> version. You can check what I did at [1]. It shouldn't have worked right?
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/compare/master...MateusBellomo:mateus-presence-text#diff-39230e150779508dd98dd29f3e3c4414R653
>>
>> 2016-07-18 10:45 GMT-03:00 Scott Godin <slgodin at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I think that's fine, but getRootNodes returns a const list.  Did you add
>>> a non-const version?
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Mateus Bellomo <
>>> mateusbellomo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I found a way of doing it but I don't know if it's ideal:
>>>>
>>>> - first I create a GenericPidfContents gPidf;
>>>> - then I'm creating a new Node dm and setting the mNamespacePrefix,
>>>> mTag,... of it;
>>>> - then I add this dm node to gPidf node:
>>>> gPidf.getRootNodes().push_back(dm).
>>>>
>>>> The gPidf is the way I was expecting (the order is not but I think this
>>>> is not relevant) but I'm doing all this stuff outside of
>>>> GenericPidfContents class (I'm doing this at resip/recon/UserAgent class to
>>>> generate a pidf to a PUBLISH sip message). What do you think about it?
>>>>
>>>> 2016-07-15 22:32 GMT-03:00 <slgodin at gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Right - there are only methods for setting simple presence.  You would
>>>>> need to add your own methods.
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 15, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Mateus Bellomo <mateusbellomo at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it is at [1]. But the examples are all generated hard coded
>>>>> style: it is created a Data type with the xml passed as string. This is the
>>>>> only way of doing this? I thought I could do this using methods from [2].
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/blob/master/resip/stack/test/testGenericPidfContents.cxx
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/blob/master/resip/stack/GenericPidfContents.hxx
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-07-15 21:56 GMT-03:00 <slgodin at gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe there is a testGenericPidfContents file under resip/test
>>>>>> with lots of examples.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Jul 15, 2016, at 8:08 PM, Mateus Bellomo <mateusbellomo at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I need to generate a pidf with new kind of tuples. In fact I would
>>>>>> like to generate a tuple like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <dm:person id="p1234">
>>>>>>    <rpid: activities/>
>>>>>> </dm:person>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Using GenericPidfContents [1] I was able to add some namespaces at
>>>>>> presence tag, but now I need also to add this extra tuples.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/blob/master/resip/stack/GenericPidfContents.hxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>>>>>> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
>>>>>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20160718/9dd8be88/attachment.htm>