[reSIProcate] Pidf class

[Mateus Bellomo]

I'm looking into the Jitsi log (logged in with mateus2 at ws.sip5060.net) and
I saw that it sends a SUBSCRIBE to presence server (with TO as
mateus1 at ws.sip5060.net).
And I saw at resiprocate (logged in with mateus1 at ws.sip5060.net) log that
it sends a PUBLISH to presence server.

But in Jitsi log I didn't saw any NOTIFY. So maybe the presence server is
not sending the messages as it should. How can I debug that?

2016-07-02 10:03 GMT-03:00 Mateus Bellomo <mateusbellomo at gmail.com>:

> > Can you see an easy way to make it work using the existing Pidf class?
>
> I'm trying to do that but it's not working so I thought it was because
> it's deprecated. I already saw and example at Jitsi log of a PUBLISH
> message and I copied exactly the same (changing the user parameters) at
> resiprocate just to test and Jitsi still couldn't get the presence from
> published from resiprocate.
>
> The strange thing is that I also logged at Lumicall and when I do that I
> could send a message from Jitsi to resiprocate so Lumicall is publishing
> it's status to Jitsi (even tough Jitsi still shows the contact as offline
> but maybe there is a bug at Jitsi).
>
> Those are the PUBLISH messages I've created so far at resiprocate: [1] and
> [2]
>
>
> > Can you look through the commit history on that file to see who added
> the deprecated annotation and post a link to the commit?
>
> The SHA1 ID is c29ea4f3db318367e32dc251823d9116b5e89afe [3]
>
> [1] http://paste.debian.net/775465/
> [2] http://paste.debian.net/775467/
> [3]
> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/commit/c29ea4f3db318367e32dc251823d9116b5e89afe
>
> 2016-07-02 3:55 GMT-03:00 Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.pro>:
>
>>
>>
>> On 01/07/16 21:26, Mateus Bellomo wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > To send a PUBLISH message I was looking at [1] as an example. But it
>> > seems that the xml generated by pidf [2] it's not completed, comparing
>> > with the one generated by Jitsi. Looking at [3] it says that Pidf is
>> > deprecated. So is there another option to use instead of Pidf?
>> >
>>
>>
>> Can you see an easy way to make it work using the existing Pidf class?
>>
>> Can you look through the commit history on that file to see who added
>> the deprecated annotation and post a link to the commit?
>>
>>
>> > [1]
>> >
>> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/blob/master/resip/dum/test/basicPublication.cxx
>> > [2]
>> >
>> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/blob/master/resip/dum/test/basicPublication.cxx#L117
>> > [3]
>> >
>> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/blob/master/resip/stack/Pidf.hxx
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> > resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
>> > https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20160702/0208c437/attachment.htm>