[reSIProcate] moving contrib/ares to rutil/ares?

[Adam Roach]

On 4/26/12 4:26 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> Given that ares is not like the other stuff under contrib (because it is
> modified), would it be better to move it under rutil/ares?  Any
> objections to this?
>
> This will also lead to us adding it to the main build system (e.g. from
> autotools), although --with-c-ares will still be supported too

I do not object to such a move. I would find it highly beneficial to 
have ares integrated into the build system so as to avoid having to 
manually build it before building the rest of the project.

/a