[reSIProcate] Question concerning resiprocate-1.5

[neil.young]

Thanks, Adam. A good news finally :)
Regards

Adam Roach schrieb:
> The rutil tree is used by just about every other part of resip. It is 
> well tested and stable.
>
> /a
>
> On 9/10/09 4:51 PM, neil.young wrote:
>> May I additionally ask for you opinion about the state of the 1.5 
>> rutil path? Is it stable? Or was it also part of the 2-3 days hack. 
>> If not, I could concentrate on P2P...
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Adam Roach schrieb:
>>> The p2p code is based on a fairly early version of the RELOAD 
>>> specification, and is incomplete. If you're interested in doing work 
>>> to bring it in line with the latest specification and/or completing 
>>> the missing components, you're on the right path.
>>>
>>> If you're trying to use it to build an application at this point in 
>>> time, you're going to be frustrated.
>>>
>>> /a
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2009 02:30 PM, neil.young wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to build the p2p branch of resiprocate-1.5. I could 
>>>> manage to successfully compile the files of the solution, but the 
>>>> link of the testconsole failed due to missing libs, namely p2p.lib 
>>>> and rutil.lib. After I added the libs, everything was fine.
>>>>
>>>> Known issue?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>>>> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org <mailto:resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org>
>>>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>>
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org <mailto:resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org>
>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20090911/17f5ce46/attachment.htm>