[reSIProcate] Question concerning resiprocate-1.5

[neil.young]

May I additionally ask for you opinion about the state of the 1.5 rutil 
path? Is it stable? Or was it also part of the 2-3 days hack. If not, I 
could concentrate on P2P...

Regards


Adam Roach schrieb:
> The p2p code is based on a fairly early version of the RELOAD 
> specification, and is incomplete. If you're interested in doing work 
> to bring it in line with the latest specification and/or completing 
> the missing components, you're on the right path.
>
> If you're trying to use it to build an application at this point in 
> time, you're going to be frustrated.
>
> /a
>
> On 09/10/2009 02:30 PM, neil.young wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to build the p2p branch of resiprocate-1.5. I could manage 
>> to successfully compile the files of the solution, but the link of 
>> the testconsole failed due to missing libs, namely p2p.lib and 
>> rutil.lib. After I added the libs, everything was fine.
>>
>> Known issue?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org <mailto:resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org>
>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20090910/2100fcc6/attachment.htm>