[reSIProcate] Transport selection and register/lookup behavior

Gabriel Hege gabriel-mailinglists at gmx.de
Fri Jul 18 15:05:37 CDT 2008


Thanks for the quick answer.

Is there a possibility to set the default transport for outgoing 
messages? I didn't find anything.

best regards,
  gabriel hege


Byron Campen wrote:
>     responses inline:
> 
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have two questions.
>> The first one is concerning the stack:
>> Is it possible to have Resiprocate switch the transport used for 
>> sending an outgoing message, when the first transport does not succeed 
>> within a certain timeframe? For example when I first send a message to 
>> a UAS and don't specify a transport in the URL, it is being sent via 
>> UDP. When the other side only listens on TCP, I have to wait until the 
>> transaction expires, when I do not want to create a concurrent 
>> transaction.
>> The way SipX handles that is to first send it via UDP and when the 
>> message is being retransmitted it also tries it via TCP. Is it 
>> possible to have a similar behavior in Resiprocate?
>>
> 
>     resip doesn't do this. It would probably be a much better idea to 
> try TCP first, and then fail over to UDP (this is a violation of 3263, 
> but I bet that doing UDP and TCP at the same time has worse 
> consequences). Ultimately, if your UAS doesn't support UDP, you have to 
> make sure it is contacted using a URI that specifies TCP. (either by 
> setting its DNS up properly, or making sure to put a transport=TCP in 
> its Contact header)
> 
>>
>> The second question is about Repro:
>> When a client registers with the proxy and specifies a port in the 
>> To-URI, you always have to specify the port, when calling that client 
>> via Repro. This is even the case when the specified port is the 
>> default port (e.g. 5060).
>> Wouldn't it it make sense for Repro to have the URIs match on lookup 
>> even though only one of them explicitly specifies the (default) port?
>>
> 
>     repro really should be ignoring the port altogether, I think. Anyone 
> disagree?
> 
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen
> 



More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list