[reSIProcate] VB: Assert in TransactionState.cxx
Scott Godin
slgodin at icescape.com
Fri Jul 18 08:47:40 CDT 2008
Hi Krister,
Sorry for the lack of responses - I've never seen this behavior, but there was some discussion about random number generation on some platforms a few months back. You may want to try a search through the posting archives and see if anything rings a bell: http://www.resiprocate.org/Searching_the_Mailing_Lists
Scott
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at resiprocate.org [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at resiprocate.org] On Behalf Of Krister Jarl
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 9:26 AM
To: resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
Subject: [reSIProcate] VB: Assert in TransactionState.cxx
Hello again!
I still haven't received any response to this so I'm rephrasing myself:
Has anybody else experienced that reciprocate generates the same branch for different requests in different dialogs? Is it known to happen?
If anybody would have the time to look at this I would much appreciate it!
/kj
________________________________
Från: Krister Jarl
Skickat: den 25 juni 2008 17:28
Till: resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
Ämne: Assert in TransactionState.cxx
Hi!
We're experiencing some problems with resiprocate-1.2. The scenario is described below:
Our implementation sends an INVITE which is answered with 100 Trying. After this we receive a 200 ok to another INVITE sent to another destination. We respond to this by calling createDialogAsUAC() and then makeAck(). This works fine in most cases (99%) but sometimes the ACK gets the same tid as the first INVITE. This results in an incorrect state and we get an assert at line 253 in TransactionState.cxx. Any ideas on what might be wrong?
Please find the logs attached. Thanks!
/kj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20080718/749c163d/attachment.htm>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list