[reSIProcate] Awful performance on Leopard

[Alan Hawrylyshen]

On Jul 11, 2008, at 21:52 , Adam Roach wrote:

> So.... for <10k transactions, we would run *faster* with the  
> firewall turned on some non-trivial fraction of the time? This is  
> getting more bizarre...

I'm not so sure that's valid. I mean the variability  under 10K  
transactions (total) is so large that I think we have to assume that  
we lose the precision in the range...
PS: it took me a minute longer than expected to disable the AFW,  
therefore the ~72K and ~97K points that are green and clearly in the w  
AFW range are really with the firewall enabled.


Here's the plots with a moving average. Initial average is inital  
point, so it's an approximation (from awk:
awk 'BEGIN { sum=0;} {if (sum==0) sum=$4; sum=(9*sum+$4)/10 ; print  
$0" "sum;}' sorted.dat  > ma.dat
)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20080711-resip-perf-ma.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 55257 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20080711/6f0d7e25/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------