[reSIProcate] Awful performance on Leopard

[Byron Campen]

	Interesting. What version of Leopard are you running? Also, what  
network interfaces were enabled on your run?

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> polycarb:test alan$ ./testStack --num-runs=100000
> Performing 100000 runs.
> 100000 registrations peformed in 34386 ms, a rate of 2908.16  
> transactions per second.]
> Note: this test runs both sides (client and server)
> polycarb:test alan$
> polycarb:test alan$ system_profiler | awk '/^Hardware/,/^[^ H]/ 
> {print} /^Memory/,/^[^ M]/ {print} /^Firewall/,/^[^  
> (Firewall)]/'Hardware: | magic_edit
> Hardware Overview:
>      Model Name: MacBook
>      Model Identifier: MacBook2,1
>      Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
>      Processor Speed: 2 GHz
>      Number Of Processors: 1
>      Total Number Of Cores: 2
>      L2 Cache: 4 MB
>      Memory: 2 GB
>      Bus Speed: 667 MHz
>
> Memory:
>    BANK 0/DIMM0:
>      Size: 1 GB
>      Type: DDR2 SDRAM
>      Speed: 667 MHz
>    BANK 1/DIMM1:
>      Size: 1 GB
>      Type: DDR2 SDRAM
>      Speed: 667 MHz
> Firewall:
>    Firewall Settings:
>      Mode: Allow all incoming connections
>
> Let's see what happens if I change the firewall settings a little....
>
> polycarb:test alan$ ./testStack Performing 10000 runs.
> 10000 registrations peformed in 3489 ms, a rate of 2866.15  
> transactions per second.]
> Note: this test runs both sides (client and server)
> polycarb:test alan$ ./testStack --num-runs=100000Performing 100000  
> runs.
> 100000 registrations peformed in 32582 ms, a rate of 3069.18  
> transactions per second.]
> Note: this test runs both sides (client and server)
> polycarb:test alan$
>
> Roughly the same...
> Firewall set to 'only allow certain applications'.
> I was prompted to permit 'testStack' to access the network when  
> starting ...
> ...
> Firewall:
>    Firewall Settings:
>      Mode: Limit incoming connections to specific services and  
> applications
>
> So, no, I don't seem to have a performance problem ...
> Odd.
> A
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2008, at 06:06 , Byron Campen wrote:
>
>> 	Try doing 100000 runs and see if that ratio holds.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Byron Campen
>>
>>> Hard to say -- I'm on 10.5.4 and here is my output from testStack  
>>> on main
>>>
>>> polycarb:test alan$ ./testStack
>>> Performing 10000 runs.
>>> 10000 registrations peformed in 4319 ms, a rate of 2315.35  
>>> transactions per second.]
>>> Note: this test runs both sides (client and server)
>>> polycarb:test alan$
>>>
>>>
>>> Tell me what to run and with what args so I can reproduce yours...
>>> This is an older MacBook (not Pro) 2GHz.
>>>
>>> A
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2008, at 15:44 , Byron Campen wrote:
>>>
>>>> 	I upgraded my laptop to Leopard recently, and it appears that  
>>>> the performance of the resip stack has gone straight down the  
>>>> toilet. I have verified on one other Leopard install. On  
>>>> inspection, it looks like the Leopard firewall is at fault  
>>>> (accounting for >90% of the cycles used by testStack). Has anyone  
>>>> else dealt with this?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Byron Campen_______________________________________________
>>>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>>>> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
>>>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20080710/b6046fe5/attachment.bin>