[reSIProcate] Does this is a SdpContents bug ?
Karlsson
boost.regex at gmail.com
Sun Jun 22 08:58:59 CDT 2008
Hi, I really think this is a bug, but no anyone reproduce it?
When I received an UPDATE request, onOffer will be fired:
void UserAgent::onOffer(InviteSessionHandle h, const SipMessage& msg, const
SdpContents& sdpContent)
*
Then parese the SDP, use this code to access the codecs:*
const SdpContents * sdp = dynamic_cast<SdpContents *>(msg.getContents());
list<SdpContents::Session::Medium>::const_iterator mediaiter =
sdp->session().media().begin();
for (; mediaiter!=sdpContent->session().media().end(); ++mediaiter)
{
if (utility.compareStringNoCase(mediaiter->name().c_str(), "audio")
== 0)
{
list<SdpContents::Session::Codec>::const_iterator codecIter =
mediaiter->codecs().begin();
for (; codecIter!=mediaiter->codecs().end(); ++codecIter)
{
AudioCodec codec;
codec.setCodecName(codecIter->getName().c_str());
<---------------*I always got the PCMU codec first*
codec.setRemoteTypeValue(codecIter->payloadType());
audioCodecList.push_back(codec);
}
}
*I always got the PCMU codec first. But I use this code not saw the PCMU in
the sdp contents:*
Data sdptext = Data::from(*sdp);
::MessageBoxA(NULL, sdptext.c_str(), "test", MB_ICONINFORMATION);
<----------- this not shows the PCMU in SDP
Please help me ,thanks.
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Karlsson <boost.regex at gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, I'm using 1.31.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Karlsson <boost.regex at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, there have a mistake, please ignore my previous email.
>>
>> *The attachment it's log file.*
>>
>>
>> 1: A called B with GSM codec, B answered call with GSM.
>>
>> 2: Now A want to using G729, Update invite with G729 only(for this UPDATE
>> mesage, the SDP just inclued the G729 only).
>> 3: B received this UPDATE invite message, then parse the SDP:
>>
>> list<SdpContents::Session::Medium>::const_iterator mediaiter =
>> sdpContent->session().media().begin();
>>
>> Data sdptext = Data::from(*sdpContent);
>> ::MessageBoxA(NULL, sdptext.c_str(), "test", MB_ICONINFORMATION); *//
>> This message shows the SDP just has G729 only.*
>>
>>
>> AudioCodec DTMFCodec;
>>
>> for (; mediaiter!=sdpContent->session().media().end(); ++mediaiter)
>> {
>> if (compareStringNoCase(mediaiter->name().c_str(), "audio") == 0)
>> {
>> mRemoteAudioPort = mediaiter->port();
>> list<SdpContents::Session::Codec>::const_iterator codecIter =
>> mediaiter->codecs().begin();
>>
>> for (; codecIter!=mediaiter->codecs().end(); ++codecIter)
>> {
>> AudioCodec codec;
>> codec.setCodecName(codecIter->getName().c_str()); *// <------------- But at here, I got the PCMU first when I received each
>> UPDATE INVITE, after PCMU, then got the G729,
>> // the **mediaiter->codecs() inclued two codecs(always PCMU first)*
>>
>> codec.setRemoteTypeValue(codecIter->payloadType());
>>
>>
>> audioCodecList.push_back(codec);
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> And I have captured the SIP message by wireshark, it's shows the UPDATE
>> invite message SDP just inclued G729 codec only, but when I using the mediaiter->codecs()
>> to
>> access the codecs, always got the PCMU first. This issue just appears with
>> UPDATE invite message, with INVITE message, it's normal.
>>
>> please help me, thank you in advance.
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20080622/04bd396d/attachment.htm>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list