[reSIProcate] resiprocate-devel Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
Mandeep Ahuja
ahuja at aksysnetworks.com
Mon Apr 28 14:00:19 CDT 2008
Ok Let me get this right. Lets try where I dont have to use the
autotools (might see a problem again future)
--host=mips-linux
corss_compile = ~/tools/linux/bin/mips_fp_le-
the cross compiler is "mips_fp_le"
Also when i was trying to make 'rutil' it complained about not finding
'ostream' which is in
~/tools/linux/target/user/include/g++-3/ directory.
I hope that can be of some help
Mandeep
Adam Roach wrote:
> I'll see if I can fix this fairly quickly -- what are the exact
> options that you would expect to pass to an autotools-generated
> ./configure script to set the compiler correctly? Is it simply
> "./configure --host=mips_fp_le"? I'll admit that my knowledge of
> autotools is a bit meager; but, as far as I know, the only way to
> trigger cross compilation with autotools is to pass it the name of the
> architecture with the "--host" flag -- and it does the same thing with
> it as the resip build system does: it prepends it to the names of the
> various gnu toolchain binaries, and tries it to see whether it works.
>
> In other words: I can split the target platform option into two
> different options (target platform and cross-compiler prefix) if
> that's what you need to suit your purposes, but I don't know enough
> about the autotools systems that I need to pass options into (such as
> ares) to know what to pass where and how.
>
> /a
>
> On 4/28/08 12:08 PM, Mandeep Ahuja wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the heads up Adam,
>> Here is the first problem
>> 1- The architecture-ostype (in my case mips-linux) does not match
>> with platform string in the name of my cross compiler
>> (mips_fp_le-gcc). I dont plan to change either of the names as I have
>> lot going on already. What can I do to get around?
>> Here is a little sample output
>> mkdir -p contrib/ares-build.Linux.mips
>> cd contrib/ares-build.Linux.mips && \
>> ../ares/configure --host=mips-linux
>> configure: WARNING: If you wanted to set the --build type, don't use
>> --host.
>> If a cross compiler is detected then cross compile mode will be used.
>> Configuring ares 1.1.2
>> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
>> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
>> checking for gawk... gawk
>> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
>> checking for mips-linux-strip... no
>> checking for strip... strip
>> checking for mips-linux-gcc... no
>> checking for gcc... gcc
>> checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
>> checking whether the C compiler works... yes
>> checking whether we are cross compiling... no
>> checking for suffix of executables...
>> checking for suffix of object files... o
>> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
>> checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
>> checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed
>> checking for style of include used by make... GNU
>> checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
>> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
>> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
>> checking for mips-linux-ranlib... no
>> checking for ranlib... ranlib
>> checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
>> checking host system type... mips-unknown-linux-gnu
>>
>> Adam Roach wrote:
>>
>>> Mandeep Ahuja wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need the autotools scripts that you guys had earlier. Remember
>>>> the 'use_autotools.sh' and 'auto_gen.sh'. I can't find them in the
>>>> latest checkout. I think last time i checked out was in 2004. If
>>>> noone has it will the old one work with the new revision. I am
>>>> doing cross-compiling.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The autotools setup never really got completed (at least, not to
>>> everyone's satisfaction), and has been pulled out of the repository
>>> for a long time now. Even if you can find a copy, I do _not_ suggest
>>> you use it. It is highly doubtful that it will work with the current
>>> tree (which has been vigorously reorganized since the last time
>>> anyone tried autotools) -- at least, not without a lot of effort.
>>>
>>> You're not stuck, though. The current build system has pretty good
>>> support for cross compilation using the gnu toolchain. Run the
>>> configure script (in the root of the project tree); when it asks
>>> which toolchain you plan on using, answer "gnu-cross." It will then
>>> prompt you for the path to the cross compiler and the name of the
>>> platform formatted as architecture-ostype (e.g., "arm-linux"). This
>>> platform name must match the platform string in the name of your
>>> cross compiler. (i.e., if your cross compiler is called
>>> "arm-linux-gcc", then your platform is called "arm-linux").
>>>
>>> If you have any problems with the cross-compilation support in the
>>> existing build system, post here about it so we can try to make
>>> things work better.
>>>
>>> /a
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list