[reSIProcate] DUM and DumShutdownHandler Implementation

[Byron Campen]

	If someone has the time/inclination to write and test an  
implementation by next week, you may do so. In the meantime, I am  
removing these parameters and leaving some TODO comments in their place.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> You’re not missing anything -  they haven’t been implemented yet.  : )
>
>
>
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.resiprocate.org  
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.resiprocate.org] On Behalf  
> Of Aron Rosenberg
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:31 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org
> Subject: [reSIProcate] DUM and DumShutdownHandler Implementation
>
>
>
> void
> shutdown (DumShutdownHandler *, unsigned long giveUpSeconds=0)
> void
> shutdownIfNoUsages (DumShutdownHandler *, unsigned long  
> giveUpSeconds=0)
>
>
>
>
> It seems that the giveUpSeconds isn’t implemented on either of  
> those DUM functions….Am I missing something?
>
>
>
> -Aron
>
> Aron Rosenberg
>
> SightSpeed Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20070926/897b2273/attachment.htm>