[reSIProcate] Handling glare conditions in DUM
Byron Campen
bcampen at estacado.net
Fri Feb 23 10:43:01 CST 2007
It would be extremely helpful if you could send us the logging
output so we'd know which assertion we've hit.
Best regards,
Byron Campen
> I was wondering if someone might shed some light on how it would be
> possible to handle a glare condition with DUM.
>
> I have a situation where an endpoint INVITE is answered and then I
> receive an ACK. Upon receipt of the ACK I want to immediately REFER
> the call (in-dialog REFER). However, the endpoint, right after
> sending the ACK is sending me a re-invite that glares with the
> Refer I send. My Refer gets a 491 from the endpoint and I resend
> the Refer again. However, in other situations I get a re-invite
> from the endpoint at the same time that I am sending a re-invite (I
> send first). Since I am a B2B and need to shuffle these re-invites,
> I run into problems with DUM being in a state (dum.mstate) that I
> can't get at that is causing assertions. Basically, my endpoint (a
> switch) always sends me a re-invite after it sends ACK.
>
> Is there a way to queue up either one of these transactions with
> DUM to resolve the glare condition??
>
> TIA for your thoughts...
>
> Bill Kovar
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20070223/41e16362/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20070223/41e16362/attachment.bin>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list