[reSIProcate] in ResponseContext::beginClientTransaction

Byron Campen bcampen at estacado.net
Sun Dec 10 21:12:54 CST 2006


	That would be a typo. Let me fix that.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> Hi repro,
>
>          In ResponseContext::beginClientTransaction,   
> ResponseContext.cxx   line 523, latest version.
>
> rt.uri().scheme() == request.header(h_Routes).front().uri().scheme();
>
>
>
> why it’s “==”, not “=”,  thanks for answer.
>
>
>
> /hongsion
>
>
>
> 发件人: hongsion [mailto:hongsion at gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2006年12月1日 9:32
> 收件人: 'Scott Godin'; 'resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org'
> 主题: 答复: [reSIProcate] HttpConnection::tryParse()
>
>
>
>          You are right, HttpConnection will be destroyed  
> immediately after TxBuffer finish sending. And actually RxBuffer  
> will receive very little size data each time, so it’s safe here.  
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> 发件人: Scott Godin [mailto:slgodin at icescape.com]
> 发送时间: 2006年11月30日 22:55
> 收件人: hongsion; resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org
> 主题: RE: [reSIProcate] HttpConnection::tryParse()
>
>
>
> HttpConnections are destroyed immediately after receiving data,  
> then sending the response.  The RxBuffer is destroyed at this  
> time.  Are you seeing any issues with this?
>
>
>
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.resiprocate.org  
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.resiprocate.org] On Behalf  
> Of hongsion
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 3:29 AM
> To: resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org
> Subject: [reSIProcate] HttpConnection::tryParse()
>
>
>
> Hi resip,
>
>          I found in HttpConnection::tryParse(), “mRxBuffer” will  
> be enlarged unlimitedly, for there is no substr process like  
> mTxBuffer. Is it? Please check!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> hongsion
>
>
>
> 发件人: hongsion [mailto:hongsion at gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2006年11月24日 15:57
> 收件人: 'resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org'
> 主题: suggestion!
>
>
>
> Hi resip,
>
>          I found ServerRegistration::dispatch(),mOriginalContacts  
> variable is not used. And stack will update database for each  
> contact. My advice is stack should update mOriginalContacts, and  
> after all contacts are updated, write mOriginalContacts back to  
> database. this way maybe more efficient. Not sure is it right or  
> not, Welcome comments.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> hongsion
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20061210/19c90ad8/attachment.htm>


More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list