[reSIProcate] Sip Register Binding Problem
Byron Campen
bcampen at estacado.net
Mon Oct 23 08:53:59 CDT 2006
The only way to address this right now is to open up transports on
both IP addresses, or use INADDR_ANY. For a UA, this works relatively
well, but nat-traversal can become an issue.
Best regards,
Byron Campen
> <image001.jpg>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Using resiprocate I have found the following issues.
>
>
>
> 1. My Linux machine has two NIC card. I have configured Ip of
> NIC-1 while adding transport using DUM.
>
> While sending registration it chooses NIC-2 Ip address and
> hence gives me 503 Service Unavailable.
>
> And any attempt to place INVITE call gets successfully done.
>
>
>
> 2. I can see this same case happens when I am creating Virtual
> IP address for a single NIC.
>
> It always selects an original IP though I have configured it
> for Virtual one.
>
> Again while sending registration it sends same error as it
> comes in 1) 503 Service unavailable.
>
> And with INVITE it successfully run.
>
>
>
> Any guess in this regards…?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Niraj
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <image001.jpg>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20061023/84539c75/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2369 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20061023/84539c75/attachment.bin>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list