[reSIProcate] resiprocate stack memeory leak?????

FrankYuan frankyuan at emergent-netsolutions.com
Thu Sep 21 11:03:32 CDT 2006


I am still working on it and will let you know as soon as I find 
anything related.

Thanks

Frank Yuan
Emergent-Netsolutions.com
972-359-6600



Byron Campen wrote:
>     This code was written long before my time here at resiprocate, so 
> I do not know. To those who are in the know, is this a relic that can 
> be safely done away with?
>
> Did you verify whether or not you had a genuine memory leak (this is 
> something I am very interested to know)?
>
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen
>
>
>> My question why NoSize(0U-1)  is used for mSize when clear func is 
>> called.
>>
>> mStateMachineFifo.size() may return either 0 or NoSize if the queue 
>> is empty.
>>
>> It should alway return 0 if the queue is empty and NoSize should not 
>> be used.
>>
>> NoSize causes confusion and is error prone.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Frank Yuan
>> Emergent-Netsolutions.com
>> 972-359-6600
>>
>>
>>
>> Jason Fischl wrote:
>>> On 9/20/06, Byron Campen <bcampen at estacado.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         As for your questions about AbstractFifo, I am unsure why 
>>>> mSize is
>>>> needed. Can anyone answer this (or, answer why clear is a no-op)?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The clear method is virtual and gets defined in the subclasses.
>>>
>>> I believe that mSize is there as an optimization.
>>>
>



More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list