[reSIProcate] resiprocate stack memeory leak?????
FrankYuan
frankyuan at emergent-netsolutions.com
Thu Sep 21 11:03:32 CDT 2006
I am still working on it and will let you know as soon as I find
anything related.
Thanks
Frank Yuan
Emergent-Netsolutions.com
972-359-6600
Byron Campen wrote:
> This code was written long before my time here at resiprocate, so
> I do not know. To those who are in the know, is this a relic that can
> be safely done away with?
>
> Did you verify whether or not you had a genuine memory leak (this is
> something I am very interested to know)?
>
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen
>
>
>> My question why NoSize(0U-1) is used for mSize when clear func is
>> called.
>>
>> mStateMachineFifo.size() may return either 0 or NoSize if the queue
>> is empty.
>>
>> It should alway return 0 if the queue is empty and NoSize should not
>> be used.
>>
>> NoSize causes confusion and is error prone.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Frank Yuan
>> Emergent-Netsolutions.com
>> 972-359-6600
>>
>>
>>
>> Jason Fischl wrote:
>>> On 9/20/06, Byron Campen <bcampen at estacado.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As for your questions about AbstractFifo, I am unsure why
>>>> mSize is
>>>> needed. Can anyone answer this (or, answer why clear is a no-op)?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The clear method is virtual and gets defined in the subclasses.
>>>
>>> I believe that mSize is there as an optimization.
>>>
>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list