[reSIProcate] 1.0 release candidate
Byron Campen
bcampen at estacado.net
Fri Aug 18 12:12:29 CDT 2006
Most of the open issues that we have been discussing have been
addressed at this point, but we have still not fixed/come to a
decision on the following:
4. UDP Transport enhancement patch to peek message size and
allocate buffer appropriately.
4. Not fixed (the MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC trick is not portable at
all). Although, it would be easy to set up a 64K staging buffer where
the datagram is initially copied, and then allocate a smaller buffer
and copy again)
6. Not using PrivateKey pass phrases at all. All private keys
must be unencrypted on the disk.
6. Probably not fixed (Cullen)
7. Change to DateCategory to make is more compatible with other
implementations.
7. Not addressed (we probably should if it is easy)
13. TLS Client Connect Inefficiency.
13. Not addressed. Discussing on list.
Do these things need to be fixed for the 1.0 release? Can they wait
for 1.1? Opinions? (Unless these are show-stoppers, we should
probably press on)
As far as general testing goes:
make install seems to be working fine on FC4 and OS 10.4.
I have verified that "make check" works on both FC4 and OS 10.4.
tfm also works on both FC4 and OS 10.4. (except for the
testEarlyMedia case, but this appears to be a timing issue in the
test-case)
Scott has tested the build (at least) on Windows. I'd feel better if
I knew we were passing some test-cases.
We are passing the protos test suite on FC4 with the PEDANTIC_STACK
build flag set (ie, we fully parse every message, giving more
opportunities for the parser to explode).
It looks to me like we would pass RFC 4475 Torture-Tests (at least as
far as stack requirements go, I don't know about DUM), but until the
test-case is completely written (a LOT of work), we cannot claim to
be Torture-Tests compliant. This will have to wait.
I think we will not have any problems dropping a release candidate
today. As per Jason's suggestion, we will just be giving a tag and a
revision number for the release candidate. Unless something pops up,
I will be doing this at the end of the day (5ish Central Time).
Best regards,
Byron Campen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2369 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20060818/53337664/attachment.bin>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list